• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
ФКН
Contacts

Moscow, 3 Bolshoy Trekhsvyatitelsky Pereulok, rooms 227, 228b

ADMINISTRATION
Professor Vera Rusinova

Head of the School of International Law
E-mail: vrusinova@hse.ru

Professor Daria Boklan

Deputy Head of the School of International Law
E-mail: dboklan@hse.ru

Svetlana Smirnova
Manager Svetlana Smirnova

E-mail: svetlana.smirnova@hse.ru

Book
Law of International Trade in the Region of the Caucasus, Central Asia and Russia

Aliyev A., Babkina E., Dmitrikova E. et al.

Brill, Nijhoff, 2022.

Article
Article 17.6(ii) of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement: Waiting for Chekhov’s Gun to Go Off

Rovnov Y.

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT. 2024. Vol. 15. No. 1. P. 106-123.

Book chapter
Russian Approaches to International Law
In press

Rusinova V.

In bk.: The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. Ch. 22. P. 1-21.

Working paper
MANDATORY CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS DUE DILIGENCE MODELS: SHOOTING BLANKS?

Rusinova V., Sergei K.

Law. LAW. Высшая школа экономики, 2021

Vera Rusinova spoke at the virtual informal meeting of the UN Open-Ended Working Group

Vera Rusinova spoke at the virtual informal meeting of the UN Open-Ended Working Group

© Unsplash

On the 24th and 31st of March 2022 Professor Vera Rusinova took part in the Virtual, open-ended informal meeting on the occasion of the Second Substantive Session of the Open-Ended Working Group on the security of and in the use of information and communications technologies(OEWG, 2021-2025). These informal meetings were focused on the role of the stakeholder community in supporting capacity-building of states in the field of information and communications technologies (ICTs) security.
In her presentation, Vera Rusinova shared some concrete recommendations on how the OEWG can contribute to capacity-building of states.

Firstly, alongside with a global level, the bilateral and regional co-operation is of crucial importance. The OEWG can enhance these forms of co-operation by elaborating model agreements and forms. It can be, for instance, a model CERT-to-CERT agreement and a model form of notification about an ITC incident.

Secondly, the notion of critical infrastructure lies at the heart of different efforts aimed at bolstering the deterrence against malicious ITC-related acts, as well as defence and resistance of states against cyber threats. So, it would be very practical, if the OEWG could have initiated drafting of a non-exhaustive, indicative list of the objects of critical infrastructure.

Thirdly, taking into account the huge importance of the experience-sharing mode, the OEWG could have suggested to the states to voluntarily share their best practices on the capacity building and bolstering the potential. As a result, the states and all other stakeholders will be able to profit not only from the 2021 GGE Compendium on applicability of International law to ICT acts, but also from the OEWG best practices collection.